Dictionary Merging in Ansible Inventories
Categories:
Projects:
c2platform/ansible
,
c2platform/rws/ansible-gis
,
c2platform/rws/ansible-collection-wincore
,
c2platform/rws/ansible-collection-gis
Problem
Dictionary merging can reduce duplication, but it also makes data flow less obvious. When merges are undocumented or applied too broadly, it becomes hard to see which values win and why.
Context
In C2 Platform inventory projects, hash_behaviour = merge in ansible.cfg
allows dictionaries from multiple variable sources to be combined. This can be
useful for layered configuration, but only when the merged structure stays easy
to reason about.
Solution
- Examine and Document Your Inventory Structure: Clearly document where and
how
hash_behaviour = mergeis applied within your Ansible projects. It’s crucial to maintain an updated inventory structure documentation, noting any instances of merged dictionaries. - Use Merging Judiciously: Employ dictionary merging primarily for host or group variables that benefit from this method. Overuse can lead to complexity and obscure data relationships.
- Thoughtful and Unique Keys: When using dictionaries ensure the keys are well chosen and unique within your inventory project.
- Rigorous Testing: Thoroughly test playbooks to validate that merged dictionaries behave as expected. This step is vital to catch any merging issues or unintended consequences early in the development cycle.
- Understand Variable Precedence: Familiarize yourself with the rules of variable precedence in Ansible. Knowledge of how variables from different levels (e.g., group_vars, host_vars) merge is critical for predicting the final configuration state.
- Conflict Resolution Strategy: Develop and document strategies for handling key conflicts in merged dictionaries. This plan ensures consistent handling of conflicts across projects.
- Secure Sensitive Data: When merging dictionaries involves sensitive information, use encryption methods like Ansible Vault. This practice ensures that sensitive data is securely managed while allowing non-sensitive information to be merged as needed.
Practical Examples
Merging win_chocolatey Configurations
When utilizing win_chocolatey variable of the c2platform.wincore.win Ansible
role for different server groups within your Ansible inventory, utilizing
“dictionaries” enables a more dynamic and flexible approach compared to simple
“lists”. This method ensures servers in multiple groups receive all necessary
packages without configuration conflicts.
Example Configuration in group_vars/windows/main.yml:
win_chocolatey:
windows:
- name: nuget.commandline
Example Configuration in group_vars/age_pro/main.yml:
win_chocolatey:
age_pro:
- name: firefox
When a server belongs to both the windows and age_pro groups, the merged
configuration for win_chocolatey will include both the NuGet command line and
Firefox, ensuring comprehensive package management across server roles.
Merged Configuration Result
win_chocolatey:
windows:
- name: nuget.commandline
age_pro:
- name: firefox
Flexibility in Key Naming
You can use any descriptive key names for categorizing configurations within
dictionaries, as long as the keys remain unique at the level where the merge
happens. For example, the keys can be whatever and some_other_key.
win_chocolatey:
whatever:
- name: nuget.commandline
win_chocolatey:
some_other_key:
- name: firefox
Limitations in Key Naming
You can choose any key name you want, but only dictionaries merge predictably in this pattern. Simple lists do not merge.
- In
group_vars/windows/main.yml:
win_chocolatey:
tools:
- name: nuget.commandline
- In
group_vars/age_pro/main.yml:
win_chocolatey:
tools:
- name: firefox
firefox or nuget.commandline and not both! You
cannot have multiple occurrences in your inventory project for a variable like
win_chocolatey with the same key in this case tools.Additional Information
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.